Create Account

Username
Password
Remember me
Email
 
13

The Charity of Steve Jobs - Lara Hoffman

7 comments, 371 views, posted 6:56 pm 09/10/2011 in Apple by waints
waints has 3219 posts, 1931 threads, 37 points
God

I got real tired of people ranting about how millions are dying and nobody is mourning and millions are mourning the passing way of Jobs and how he did nothing for the anybody, so I looked up and found this. And even though I am no fan of Jobs but you have to acknowledge that man's vision. And if he made millions in the process he totally earned it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE CHARITY OF STEVE JOBS

Steve Jobs while he lived was occasionally criticized for not being more charitable—like his compatriot and competitor Bill Gates or Warren Buffett. Hogwash. If you wanted to, you couldn’t account for all the societal good Steve Jobs has done.

Start with his company. Folks who believe economies are a fixed pie must implode as they consider how Steve Jobs (with pal “Woz”) started with an idea and an empty garage and built a firm worth $350 billion. That’s $350 billion in shareholder value that didn’t exist 35 years ago. Poof! Now, tally up his employees’ salaries and benefits. Every one of them, ever—at Apple, NeXT and Pixar. That’s a lot of wealth created out of effectively thin air. Then think about how his employees invested, spent and saved that money. And sure, gave to charities of their choosing.

Oh, but let’s not forget the game-changing wave of innovation Steve was responsible for. He was on the forefront of the PC revolution. You may never own an Apple product in your life or want to own their stock, but Microsoft literally would not be what it is today if not for a sometimes tempestuous rivalry between Steve and Bill Gates. Nor would any other computer firm, software firm, component firm, etc. That competition is what has led computers but also a huge range of personal electronics (not just Apple’s) to be faster, smaller, sometimes bigger (think computer monitors, TVs), exponentially more powerful and all around awesome-saucier.

You can’t possibly wrap your brain around how the world has been vastly improved by those two tinkering away in their separate garages. And the industries and individual firms (and therefore the shareholder value, the jobs, etc.) that simply could not exist today the way they do. My guess is those charities Jobs is criticized for not giving more heavily to can’t, today, create a balance sheet, solicit funds, dig a well or build a schoolhouse without using some product that was created by, inspired by or competed directly against Steve Jobs.

Pixar. If you don’t have kids or have a heart of stone, maybe you don’t appreciate the joy unleashed on the world by Woody, Jessie, Buzz, Sulley, Mike, Nemo, Wall-e, Doug the talking dog, Jack-Jack. I know I’m filled with joy (as are nearby diners) when my three-year-old spends a quiet 90 minutes watching a Pixar movie on my (heavily armored) iPhone in a fine dining establishment.

Oh, and Pixar’s (now Disney’s) shareholder value. And their employees. And their wealth multiplied as they spend, save, invest. And all the merchandising. And the stores that sell the merchandising. And their employees. And apps! A whole cottage industry just around apps! Didn’t exist before—and now exists for products beyond Apple. And those firms and their employees and and and.

While many today spend an inordinate amount of time pontificating their political views or charitable cause of choice, Jobs was mostly interested in creating products that enrich lives and, yes, creating his namesake—jobs. Would that other entrepreneurial-minded folks could be so charitable. Thanks, Steve

HERE

Extra Points Given by:

Comments

4
7:10 pm 09/10/2011

evolution

I'm not saying that the assertion about Steve Jobs' charity is necessarily true or false, but in the 500+ words or so above, I see nothing about Jobs' actual contributions to charity.

1
7:33 pm 09/10/2011

waints

There is none, he never donated to charity. Or at least no one knows yet.

1
7:34 pm 09/10/2011

waints

The point of the article is that even though he never donated to a charity still his contribution to society is way too much.

2
8:01 pm 09/10/2011

z0phi3l

What a bunch of ass kissing bullshit, Jobs gave no money to charities because he was a greedy fuck, his "contributions to society" were and have always been over priced hipster gear.

1
8:24 pm 09/10/2011

Sypher_5

Cut price hardware at top dollar. Not exactly charity is it ?

2
9:41 pm 09/10/2011

Wombat_Harness

I seem to recall that he was believed to have given a lot (like tens of millions of dollars) to a medical facility after his liver transplant... whether that was charity or self-interest is up to others to decide...

One of the problems is that he was so intensely secretive what he did or didn't do is hard to judge (though I do believe he's supposed to have stopped charitable things at Apple which Tim Cook has recently rescinded.)

0
9:58 pm 09/10/2011

griffin

Quote by z0phi3l:
because he was a greedy fuck,


I think he was a mean fuck. Difference there.
But I agree with the gist of what the article says, though I think they overstate it. He certainly has a chunk of responsibility for the early evolution of the PC, and also latterly the cellphone and the tablet. You yourself have benefited from the competition he helped spur in these fields. Like we all benefit still today from Henry Ford, I suppose. But yeah, I also agree that there is a serious amount of ass-kissing in the article.

Add Comment

Log in via teoti, or register to add a comment!