17

NHS sued for failure to help transgender patients with fertility

10 comments, 241 views, posted 8:42 pm 23/09/2018 in News by HariSeldon
HariSeldon has 6553 posts, 3437 threads, 414 points
Uber God

NHS England is to be taken to court by the UK’s equality watchdog for failing to offer fertility services to transgender patients.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission will launch a high-profile judicial review action, a legal manoeuvre that is likely to prove controversial at a time when the NHS is struggling to balance budgets and provide core services.

Last month the Observer reported that the commission had written to NHS England putting it on notice that it needed to offer fertility services to transgender patients before they underwent treatment for gender dysphoria, a process that normally results in a loss of fertility.

By extracting and storing eggs and sperm before they undergo gender reassignment, transgender people can choose to have their biological children delivered via surrogates later in life. However, many are keen to proceed with treatment when they are teenagers, and may not have the resources to pay for such fertility services. This, the commission argues, discriminates against transgender people, whom it says should be offered the services as a standard procedure.

NHS England maintains that it is not its responsibility to ensure that fertility treatment is available to all patients, including transgender people. Currently it falls to individual clinical commissioning groups – the bodies that buy services for patients – to decide whether to provide them on the NHS, but many choose not to do so for transgender patients, according to the commission.

After receiving NHS England’s response , the commission has said it will now start legal proceedings. It is understood that NHS England continues to argue that it is under no obligation to offer the service at a national level.

“We have received a comprehensive response from NHS England to our letter regarding the provision of fertility services for transgender patients before they undergo treatment for gender dysphoria,” said Rebecca Hilsenrath, chief executive of the commission.

“We are proceeding with our judicial review claim and will remain in discussions with NHS England about the need to ensure the transgender community can access health services free from discrimination, and that individuals do not have to choose between treatment for gender dysphoria and the chance to start a family.”

The commission argues that gender dysphoria falls within NHS England’s specialised commissioning remit, which ensures appropriate treatment is given to those with complex conditions.

The legal case is likely to shine a light on how a large increase in people requesting transitioning treatment is placing greater demands on the health service.

Penny Mordaunt, minister for women and equalities, has launched an inquiry into what has driven a 4,400% increase in the number of girls being referred for transitioning treatment in the past decade. In 2009, 40 girls were referred by doctors for gender treatment. Last year the number had risen to 1,806.

The role of social media and the teaching of transgender issues in schools will form part of the inquiry.

A spokeswoman for NHS England said: “NHS England has responded in detail to the EHRC explaining why we believe their request is both misjudged and potentially unfair to NHS patients. If, however, they still decide to sue the NHS, the courts will consider the matter in the usual way.”

Extra Points Given by:

Flee (10), REALITY (5)

Comments

3
8:43 pm 23/09/2018

elsels

So confusing. :/

4
9:03 pm 23/09/2018

Flee

What ever happened to people taking responsibility for their actions. Of you are going to get gender reassignment then pay to store your own eggs/sperm.

NHS should be for things people need, not what they want.

2
12:18 am 24/09/2018

Quaektem

See, I thought this was going to go the other way... you know Trans-women wanting NHS to make them eggs and Trans-men needing sperm.

Based on this logic, anyone who is doing anything that might put their fertility at risk should be covered. Riding bikes competitively? Covered. Doing Meth? Covered. Being treated for suicidal tendencies? Covered (Can the NHS really keep their parents from having grandchildren if they want?). Staring in Jackass 6? Covered. Driving an auto? Covered.

When you start spreading the requests of the vocal fringe equally across the general population it exposes the special treatment they are actually demanding in the name of equality.

2
4:35 pm 24/09/2018

REALITY

I'm pretty sure they shouldn't be procreating or have the ability to adopt a child.

...wait.....

'flips through pages, fuck it, chucks it in the fire.

1
4:46 am 25/09/2018

Quaektem

I actually would not agree. It's not my place to dictate the actions of another and, if they found a willing baby maker and paid for the costs I would not deny them the right to procreate. If I can stand aside and allow the destruction of life based on personal freedom, I must do the same for the creation of life.

0
1:47 pm 25/09/2018

dr3n

fuck me.. its no wonder you are single...

surprise???

1
5:52 am 26/09/2018

Quaektem

Thanks mate

Way to miss the entire point btw. I was actually supporting your side of the argument... dumbass.

0
6:20 am 26/09/2018

dr3n

And I'm helping you with your spinster lifestyle you bellend!

You know your going to end up owning 18 cats if you keep going on like this don't you?

/hugs!

1
4:41 am 27/09/2018

Quaektem

Nah. But if you want to help and can play bottom, send me a PM with a pic and you might be the liberal that captures my heart <3

0
11:55 am 27/09/2018

dr3n

Add Comment

via teoti, or register to add a comment!