32

Republicans say 'no question' Saudi crown prince ordered Khashoggi murder

7 comments, 169 views, posted 8:22 am 05/12/2018 in News by dr3n
dr3n has 11517 posts, 4660 threads, 718 points
You've been mugged off again son..

only the best people..


After CIA briefing, Republicans say 'no question' Saudi crown prince ordered Khashoggi murder
Following a briefing by CIA director Gina Haspel Tuesday on the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, leading Republican senators told reporters that there was "zero question" that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered the brutal murder.

Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican, said "I have zero question in my mind that the Crown Prince MBS ordered the killing, monitored the killing, knew exactly what was happening. Planned it in advance. If he was in front of a jury he would be convicted in 30 minutes. Guilty," Corker said.

Corker called the Trump administration's claim that there is no direct evidence of the crown prince's involvement "unacceptable."

South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said, "There's not a smoking gun, there's a smoking saw."

"You have to be willfully blind not to come to the conclusion that this was orchestrated and organized by people under the command of MBS and that he was intricately involved in the demise of Mr. Khashoggi," he said.

He went on: "If the Saudi government is going to be in the hands of this man, I find it very difficult to be able to do business because I think he's crazy, I think he's dangerous, and he has put the relationship at risk."

Graham concluded that he can no longer support arms sales to the kingdom.

Given those comments, it appeared Haspel's briefing would not help the administration win back support for its military aid to the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen.

The fact that the briefing was limited to a small group angered several senators, including Republican allies of President Trump.

A furious Sen. Rand Paul lashed out as the closed-door briefing was taking place. The Kentucky Republican told reporters of the briefing, “We’re reading about it in the media."

“I think it’s wrong for the CIA to have expressed a conclusion that the Crown Prince was involved with the killing of Khashoggi and then withhold that information,” he said.

He went on: “I think the time has come for the Senate to grab back foreign policy and say that, ‘you know what, the president, no president, this president, or the previous president has the power to take our country to war with Saudi Arabia and Yemen without the permission of the Senate.’”

He blasted the move as a sign of the "deep state," tweeting, "Why shouldn't every senator know what is going on? The deep state wants to keep everyone in the dark. This is just ridiculous!"

Do you want to know what the deep state is? The CIA Director is coming to the US Senate and only briefing a select few members of the Senate. Why shouldn’t every senator know what is going on? The deep state wants to keep everyone in the dark. This is just ridiculous! — Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) December 4, 2018

It was not clear why the group was limited to eight senators.

"I think it would have been good to have the full Senate," Corker said Monday. Corker voted to advance the Yemen resolution to send a message to the White House and the Saudis, he said last week, but urged the administration to provide answers so that the measure wouldn't ultimately pass.

When asked why it was limited, Corker said, "I don't know."

The Senate's top Democrat, Chuck Schumer of New York, called on Haspel to testify before the full Senate after sitting in on the Tuesday briefing.

“While I will not discuss the content of the Haspel briefing, it reinforced the need for a strong response to the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. CIA Director Haspel should brief the full Senate without delay," Schumer said in a statement.

The CIA declined to comment Tuesday.

Last week, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary James Mattis briefed all 100 senators, urging them to vote down a War Powers Resolution that would pull U.S. support to the coalition, which is powered by the Saudis and the United Arab Emirates and fighting an alliance led by Iranian-aligned Houthi rebels in Yemen. Pompeo and Mattis said U.S. support for that war was vital for national security and they denied that there was any "direct" evidence that the Crown Prince was involved in Khashoggi's killing.

Senators were furious that Haspel did not show, blaming the White House for blocking her. Hours after that briefing, unhappy with the administration's lack of answers and unwavering support for the Saudis despite the murder of Khashoggi, a majority of senators voted to advance that Yemen resolution.

The Senate is likely to take up the Yemen resolution next week, but a vote could come as early as Thursday.

While just eight months ago it was voted down, the legislation now has the support of all Democrats and a handful of Republicans, likely giving it enough support to pass. The House blocked a similar bill in mid-November, but when Democrats take control in January, it is expected to be a top priority.

Despite the Saudis' murder of Khashoggi and other aggressive behavior -- their bombing campaign in Yemen, the detention of Lebanese Prime Minister Said Hariri, and their blockade of another U.S. ally Qatar -- the Trump administration has argued that the Saudis are a critical U.S. partner and a bulwark of stability in the region

Extra Points Given by:

Comments

2
8:42 am 05/12/2018

Ram

these are awkward painful strange 'steeping stones' to the New World Order coming

plain and simple

you can see it everywhere everyday

2
7:47 pm 05/12/2018

LordViscera

somewhere along the way the US is going to have to decide whether or not its allies have carte blanche to do whatever they have to do or are these relationships determined by agreed upon Behavior

2
2:13 pm 06/12/2018

Vormid

Did you know that Germany declared war on the US first? I guess I missed that in History 101. Seems we couldn't make up our minds back then either about what we would and would not tolerate in an ally/enemy nation. Not that Saudi and WWII era Germany are really comparable...Just saying we tend to make decisions based on $$$. This is not unique to the Trump admin by any means.

3
2:22 pm 06/12/2018

Flee

What is fun about WW2 and US involvement is that Germany warned the US that any boat going to the area would be fired upon and the US sent it anyway.

If I'm correct in my history. Sounds like the US wanted in the war but needed the people to agree.

Much like every other event that "pushed" the US into war....

3
2:29 pm 06/12/2018

Vormid

I think without Japanese involvement we probably would have sidelined it much longer since there were business interests involved.

1
3:03 pm 06/12/2018

Flee

You referring to the bush family's IG interests?

1
6:42 pm 06/12/2018

Vormid

Quote by Flee:
You referring to the bush family's IG interests?



I'm sure they were not alone.

Add Comment

via teoti, or register to add a comment!