Create Account

Username
Password
Remember me
Email
 
22

The Avengers: Why Pirates Failed To Prevent A Box Office Record

3 comments, 368 views, posted 9:50 am 09/05/2012 in Useful by bradpitt
bradpitt has 3017 posts, 1695 threads, 0 points

The Avengers: Why Pirates Failed To Prevent A Box Office Record

Despite the widespread availability of pirated releases, The Avengers just
scored a record-breaking $200 million opening weekend at the box
office. While some are baffled to see that piracy failed to crush the movie’s
profits, it’s really not that surprising. Claiming a camcorded copy of a movie
seriously impacts box office attendance is the same as arguing that concert
bootlegs stop people from seeing artists on stage.

A week before its premiere in US movie theaters, a camcorded version of The
Avengers appeared online.

Immediately thousands of fans jumped on the release and according to figures
collated by TorrentFreak, in the days that followed it was downloaded half a
million times. While this may very well be a record for a “CAM” movie, it failed
to exceed the download numbers of several other movies that were available in
higher quality.

Record or not, the movie’s distributer Disney must have been terrified by this
early release. However, this weekend the suits at the studio were able to breathe
a sign of relief, or rather, start popping open the Champagne.

With more than $200 million in box office revenue, The Avengers had the most
successful first weekend in movie history. It broke the record set by Harry Potter
last year by more than $30 million, despite the “massive” piracy.

But is this really such a big surprise? Not when you look at the numbers.

Of all the people who downloaded a pirate copy of the film about 20% came from
the US. This means that roughly 100,000 Americans have downloaded a copy online
through BitTorrent. Now, IF all these people bought a movie ticket instead then box
office revenue would be just 0.5% higher.

Not much of an impact, and even less when you consider that these “pirates” do
not all count as a lost sale.

We don’t think that there are many movie fans who see a low quality camcorded
version of a movie as a true alternative to watching a film in a movie theater. The two
are totally different experiences, and not direct competition at all.

If anything, downloading a camcorded movie could be compared to downloading a low
quality bootleg of a concert. People who download these are collectors, passionate fans,
or just curious. But in no way do these bootlegs seriously hurt concert attendances.

The same might be said for advance leaks of games. These pre-release copies are often
downloaded by tens of thousands of people, but not necessarily those who refuse to pay.
The people who download these buggy and sometimes hardly playable games are often
curious game fanatics who tend to buy the official game when it comes out.

The claim that camcorded films are killing the movie industry is nonsense and spending
millions of dollars on anti-camcording technologies is simply not worth it.

But does this mean that piracy is not an issue for the movie industry at all? Well not so fast.

A recent study showed that the US box office is not suffering from movie piracy, but that
there is a detrimental effect on international box office figures. The researchers attribute this
impact to the wide release gaps, which sometimes result in a high quality DVD copy being
available on pirate sites while a movie is still showing in theaters.

These high quality copies are more likely to “compete” with movie theater attendance and if
a movie is not showing in local theaters at all, it definitely has the potential to impact future
attendance.

This is even more true for the DVD-aftermarket and VOD sales. High quality pirated
copies are direct competition and can impact revenues.

The challenge for the movie industry is to make legal offerings more appealing than pirated
counterparts. Of course it may not always be able to compete with “free,” but there is still a
lot of ground to make up when it comes to availability and quality of legal offerings.

But in no way are camcorded copies killing the US movie industry.

Extra Points Given by:

aion_z (5), Quaektem (5), Edorph (5), Zeddicus (5)

Comments

6
12:02 pm 09/05/2012

Quaektem

It was a success because it was a great movie.

They tried to blame the crappy returns of Wolverine on a leaked screener, but let's face it... Wolverine sucked and because people found that out before shelling out $10 to see it the receipts suffered. Now, how many more people were going to go to the theater that first weekend, end up even more pissed because they paid for crap? It may have increased the opening weekend sales, but there would have been a dramatic drop after that.

If Hollywood wants to bundle crap they shouldn't blame bootlegs. Avatar and Titanic both did well on re-releases long after the DVDs were available. Why? Because they were good. It's time Hollywood stopped relying on the Trailer editors to trick people into making crappy movies profitable.

Of course, dropping that $10-$15 price tag would go a long way too. After all a couple could spend less waiting a month and buying a copy (that's what we do now, if it's not a theater-quality movie I just wait for Redbox or just buy it when it comes out. I haven't seen a comedy in a theater in years now).

2
1:55 pm 09/05/2012

cyvoid

i remember when it was 6 months to a year before the dvd was out.

2
9:58 pm 09/05/2012

Flee

Quote by Quaektem:
It's time Hollywood stopped relying on the Trailer editors to trick people into making crappy movies profitable.


or stop showing the whole damned movie in the trailer.

Add Comment

via teoti, or register to add a comment!