Create Account

Username
Password
Remember me
Email
 
68

Corporatism Is Not Capitalism

4 comments, 160 views, posted 3:54 pm 19/06/2012 in Useful by golfhack
golfhack has 9352 posts, 3742 threads, 259 points, location: Next To The Bacon
Uber Moderator

Right now, there is a lot of talk about the evils of “capitalism”. But it is not really accurate to say that we live in a capitalist system. Rather, what we have in the United States today, and what most of the world is living under, is much more accurately described as “corporatism”. Under corporatism, most wealth and power is concentrated in the hands of giant corporations and big government is used as a tool by these corporations to consolidate wealth and power even further. In a corporatist system, the wealth and power of individuals and small businesses is dwarfed by the overwhelming dominance of the corporations. Eventually, the corporations end up owning almost everything and they end up dominating nearly every aspect of society. As you will see below, this very accurately describes the United States of America today. Corporatism is killing this country, and it is not what our founding fathers intended.

The following is the definition of “corporatism” from the Merriam-Webster dictionary….

the organization of a society into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and exercising control over persons and activities within their jurisdiction

Corporatism is actually not too different from socialism or communism. They are all “collectivist” economic systems. Under corporatism, wealth and power are even more highly concentrated than they are under socialism or communism, and the truth is that none of them are “egalitarian” economic systems. Under all collectivist systems, a small elite almost always enjoys most of the benefits while most of the rest of the population suffers.

The Occupy Wall Street protesters realize that our economic system is fundamentally unjust in many ways, but the problem is that most of them want to trade one form of collectivism for another.

But our founding fathers never intended for us to have a collectivist system.

Instead, they intended for us to enjoy a capitalist system where true competition and the free enterprise system would allow individuals and small businesses to thrive.

In an article that was posted earlier this year on Addicting Info, Stephen D. Foster Jr. detailed how our founding fathers actually felt about corporations….

The East India Company was the largest corporation of its day and its dominance of trade angered the colonists so much, that they dumped the tea products it had on a ship into Boston Harbor which today is universally known as the Boston Tea Party. At the time, in Britain, large corporations funded elections generously and its stock was owned by nearly everyone in parliament. The founding fathers did not think much of these corporations that had great wealth and great influence in government. And that is precisely why they put restrictions upon them after the government was organized under the Constitution.

After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense.

Our founding fathers would have never approved of any form of collectivism. They understood that all great concentrations of wealth and power represent a significant threat to the freedoms and liberties of average citizens.

Are you not convinced that we live in a corporatist system?

Well, keep reading.

Extra Points Given by:

Viscera (20), Quaektem (25), griffin (10), evolution (10)

Comments

1
6:01 pm 19/06/2012

Viscera

this I would agree with

2
6:26 pm 19/06/2012

Quaektem

No argument here. The only thing that I would point out the number of laws and regulations that cripple small business thus promoting giant corporations. In other words, Washington is creating the monster than blamining it for everything. Even Dr. Frankenstein wasn't that brilliant!

2
7:12 pm 19/06/2012

griffin

I believe that we suffer under statism, a variant of corporatism. In this model, large corporations get tax breaks, subsidies and other preferential treatment (like never-ending copyrights etc.) at the public expense. We have concentration of wealth due to statism, and not corporatism per se. Statism is corporatism, but one step further in that otherwise corporate nobodies (Blackwater and other shadowy asshole companies) get government licenses, contracts and preferential treatment over other corporations. So it isn't merely corporatism, it is crony corporatism. Oil companies, banks, investment firms, auto manufacturers, defense contracters, airplane builders, and every union in the country just fucking love this system.

The best part is where the public re-elect the politicians who run this system instead of running them out of town on a rail, as would have been cheerfully done in the past.

Please don't forget to vote for your choice of Tweedleshithead or Tweedleasshole in November.

2
7:33 pm 19/06/2012

golfhack

Or, as Trey Parker & Matt Stone called it... A Giant Douche or a Turd Sandwich.

Add Comment

Log in via teoti, or register to add a comment!