28

US Air Marshals making 4 arrests yearly - taxpayer cost $200 million per arrest

31 comments, 402 views, posted 10:30 pm 01/03/2012 in WTF! by thomasslavin
thomasslavin has 3133 posts, 1768 threads, 276 points
Uber God Earl of Erroll

Congressman John J. Duncan, addressing the U. S. House of Representatives

Probably the most needless, useless agency in the entire Federal Government is the Air Marshal Service.
In the Homeland Security Appropriations bill we will take up next week, we will appropriate $860 million for this needless, useless agency. This money is a total waste: $860 million for people to sit on airplanes and simply fly back and forth, back and forth. What a cushy, easy job.
And listen to this paragraph from a front-page story in the USA Today last November: “Since 9/11, more than three dozen Federal air marshals have been charged with crimes, and hundreds more have been accused of misconduct. Cases range from drunken driving and domestic violence to aiding a human-trafficking ring and trying to smuggle explosives from Afghanistan.''
Actually, there have been many more arrests of Federal air marshals than that story reported, quite a few for felony offenses. In fact, more air marshals have been arrested than the number of people arrested by air marshals.
We now have approximately 4,000 in the Federal Air Marshals Service, yet they have made an average of just 4.2 arrests a year since 2001. This comes out to an average of about one arrest a year per 1,000 employees.
Now, let me make that clear. Their thousands of employees are not making one arrest per year each. They are averaging slightly over four arrests each year by the entire agency. In other words, we are spending approximately $200 million per arrest. Let me repeat that: we are spending approximately $200 million per arrest.
Professor Ian Lustick of the University of Pennsylvania wrote last year about the money feeding frenzy of the war on terror. And he wrote this: “Nearly 7 years after September 11, 2001,'' he wrote this last year, “what accounts for the vast discrepancy between the terrorist threat facing America and the scale of our response? Why, absent any evidence of a serious terror threat, is a war to on terror so enormous, so all-encompassing, and still expanding? The fundamental answer is that al Qaeda's most important accomplishment was not to hijack our planes but to hijack our political system.”
“For a multitude of politicians, interest groups and professional associations, corporations, media organizations, universities, local and State governments and Federal agency officials, the war on terror is now a major profit center, a funding bonanza, and a set of slogans and sound bites to be inserted into budget, grant, and contract proposals.''
And finally, Professor Lustick wrote: “For the country as a whole, however, it has become maelstrom of waste.'' And there is no agency for which those words are more applicable than the Federal Air Marshal Service.
In case anyone is wondering, the Air Marshal Service has done nothing to me, and I know none of its employees. But I do know with absolute certainty that this $860 million we are about to give them could be better spent on thousands of other things.
As far as I'm concerned, it is just money going down a drain for the little good it will do. When we are so many trillions of dollars in debt, a national debt of over $13 trillion, we simply cannot afford to waste money in this way.

http://duncan.house.gov/2009/06/22062009.shtml

Extra Points Given by:

Flee (10), griffin (5), bradpitt (10)

Comments

0
3:19 am 02/03/2012

Quaektem

Quote by backroom:
How many planes have been blown out of the sky lately?



Go Bush?

0
3:19 am 02/03/2012

Quaektem

Quote by Flee:
Arguing...
over...
a...
moot....
item....

Stop clinging to one small moot detail.



Welcome to my world.

0
2:23 pm 02/03/2012

backroom

Quote by Flee:
Stop clinging to one small moot detail.


Quit raising them as arguing points.

0
2:23 pm 02/03/2012

backroom

Quote by Quaektem:
Go Bush?


Was that necessary?
Really?
Does it have any place in the discussion?

0
5:37 pm 02/03/2012

Quaektem

Well, since the Federal Marshall plan was set up under the Bush Administration and Homeland security shouldn't he get credit for the lack of planes being blown out of the sky?

Or shall we just thank Obama?

0
5:56 pm 02/03/2012

backroom

Do you always answer a question... in this case 3 of them... with a question?
Oh yeah... sorry.
So your answer is "No, it was not necessary. I just can't help myself."

If you insist on giving somebody credit consider JFK.
Created in '63.
Began service in '68.
Expanded in '69. (Thank you Nixon.)
Expanded again in '85. (Do we thank Reagan or the TWA hijackers?)

It was expanded again, not set up as you state, under the Bush administration.

The truth is in the details. Not just the details you choose to recognize.

For this opportunity...
Thank You.

Add Comment

via teoti, or register to add a comment!